Situational leadership: what is it and how do you apply it?
Not every employee requires the same management style. An experienced professional who has been working independently for years requires something very different from a new colleague who is just starting out. Situational leadership is the leadership model that takes this into account. It enables managers to adapt their style to the situation, the employee's level of development, and the complexity of the task.
The model was developed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard and is one of the most widely used leadership models in organizations worldwide. Its strength lies in its simplicity: there are four styles, and each style suits a different type of employee or situation.
The four leadership styles
S1: Instructing (directing)
With this style, the manager gives clear instructions and monitors closely. This works best with employees who have little experience with a specific task but are motivated to learn. Think of a new employee who starts enthusiastically but does not yet know how processes work.
The pitfall of this style is that you get stuck in it for too long. If an employee grows but you continue to instruct, it feels like mistrust. Timing is therefore crucial.
S2: Coaching
The coaching style combines direction with support. You still explain what needs to be done, but at the same time provide space for questions, personal input, and development. This style suits employees who are gaining some experience but sometimes get stuck or have doubts.
Coaching requires good conversation techniques: listening, asking follow-up questions, and helping the employee arrive at their own insights. It is more time-consuming than instructing, but results in more independent employees in the long run.
S3: Supporting
With the supportive style, the balance shifts. The employee has largely mastered the skills but occasionally needs confirmation or motivation. Your role as a manager becomes more that of a sparring partner than a helmsman.
This is the moment when you ask more questions than you give answers. “How would you approach this?” and “What do you need to complete this?” are typical questions for this style. You show confidence and encourage ownership.
S4: Delegating
The employee is both competent and motivated. You hand over responsibility completely and only get involved in the broad outlines. This is the style that many leaders want to achieve with their team members — and rightly so, because it gives you as a manager room for strategic tasks.
However, delegation still often goes wrong. The most common mistake: delegating to someone who is not yet ready for it, simply because you are too busy yourself. That leads to frustration on both sides.
Assessing the development level of employees
The core of situational leadership is correctly assessing two factors: competence and commitment. Blanchard distinguishes four levels of development:
D1 — Enthusiastic beginner: Highly motivated, but little knowledge or experience. Fits style S1.
D2 — Disappointed student: Growing competence, but declining motivation due to setbacks. Fits style S2.
D3 — Capable but cautious employee: The skills are there, but self-confidence fluctuates. Fits style S3.
D4 — Self-directed professional: Competent and motivated. Fits style S4.
Important: the development level is task-specificSomeone can be a D4 for one task and a D1 for a new responsibility. Situational leadership therefore requires continuous observation and adjustment.
Common mistakes in situational leadership
The model sounds logical, but in practice, things regularly go wrong. The most common pitfalls:
One style for everyone. Many managers have a preferred style and apply it by default, regardless of the situation. A born delegator provides too little guidance to new employees. A controller does not let go of experienced staff.
Misjudging the level of development. Enthusiasm is confused with competence, or silence is interpreted as disinterest when it is insecurity. Regular one-on-one conversations help to keep this sharp.
Delegating too quickly. Under time pressure, managers delegate tasks to employees who are not yet ready for them. The result: errors, rework, and demotivation.
Situational leadership in practice
How do you translate this model into your daily work? A few concrete applications:
Open up the development level for discussion. Ask your team members how they assess their own competence and motivation for a specific task. This prevents assumptions and creates a shared understanding.
Vary consciously. Schedule a moment each week to reflect: which style did I use this week, and was it appropriate? Only by consciously varying do you develop flexibility as a leader.
Link it to development conversations. Situational leadership offers a shared language for growth. You can discuss with an employee: “For this task, you are currently at D2; how do we grow to D3?”
Getting started with situational leadership
Situational leadership is not a theoretical concept that you learn from a book. It is a practical skill that you develop by practicing, receiving feedback, and reflecting on your own behavior. management training helps you develop this skill at an accelerated pace in an environment where you can experiment safely.
Ready to broaden your leadership style? Discover the management training courses by Kenneth Smit and learn how to effectively adapt your style to every situation and every team member.
Situational leadership is a leadership model by Hersey and Blanchard in which you adapt your leadership style to the employee's level of development and the complexity of the task.
The four styles are: S1 Instructing (directing), S2 Coaching (coaching), S3 Supporting (supporting), and S4 Delegating (delegating). Each style corresponds to a different development level of the employee.
By assessing two factors: the employee's competence and commitment to the specific task. The development level is task-specific: someone may be independent for one task and require intensive guidance for another.